English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
84
Reports
84
Properties
62
States Parties
 1 2 3 4 5  See All
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of consolidation and engineering measures
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Threats to monuments’ foundations due to geological instability of riverbank
States Parties:  Niger
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment
States Parties:  Oman
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Iraq
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragile mud brick structures
States Parties:  Poland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Oman
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structure of the Fort
States Parties:  Mauritania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations
States Parties:  Belarus
Poland
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Effect on forest biomes through drainage of agricultural land on the Belarus side and a reservoir on the Polish side; b) Presence of an artificial fence along the international boundary impeding large mammal movement.
States Parties:  Indonesia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
States Parties:  Albania
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Poor state of conservation of the property ; c) Insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town
States Parties:  Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Deterioration of the architectural and urban coherence and integrity of the property; b) Lack of adequate conservation mechanisms.
States Parties:  Afghanistan
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Consolidation of the cliffs and nichesb) Lack of a long-term on-site monitoring systemc) Demining
States Parties:  Portugal
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Lithuania
Russian Federation
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties:  Cameroon
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
 1 2 3 4 5  See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.