English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
10
Reports
10
Properties
8
States Parties
States Parties:  Niger
Year:  2009
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Poverty
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties:  Panama
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
States Parties:  Panama
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric of the property by environmental factors, lack of maintenance, as well as polluted water
States Parties:  Pakistan
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: a) Significant decay of the property caused by local climatic conditions and alluvial erosionb) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tombd) Lack of monitoring
States Parties:  Georgia
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: f) Loss of authenticity
States Parties:  Senegal
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: Risk of collapse of historic buildings;
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: b) Lack of maintenance of dwelling places;
States Parties:  Morocco
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Other Threats: a) Partial abandonment of the property;
States Parties:  Algeria
Year:  2009
Document Source:  WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Erosion and siltation/ deposition
Properties
Categories

Regions


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.