English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
21
Reports
21
Properties
19
States Parties
 1 2  See All
States Parties:  Morocco
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Need to preserve the landscape
States Parties:  Indonesia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
States Parties:  Albania
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Poor state of conservation of the property ; c) Insufficient implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions
States Parties:  Dominican Republic
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Portugal
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Montenegro
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Panama
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric by environmental factors
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: rural poverty
States Parties:  Czechia
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Romania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Deterioration of the monuments in general and the fortification in particular
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  China
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Morocco
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: Near total abandonment of the site
States Parties:  India
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  United Republic of Tanzania
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year:  2005
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric.
States Parties:  Bulgaria
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  France
Spain
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties:  South Africa
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site
States Parties:  Uganda
Year:  2005
Document Source:  WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
Other Threats: a) Anti-personnel mines infestation in the park; b) Degradation of lands around the park
 1 2  See All


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.