English Français

State of Conservation

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
11
Reports
11
Properties
9
States Parties
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2013
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add
Threats*:
States Parties:  Ethiopia
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*:
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*:
States Parties:  Palestine
Year:  2013
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*:
Other Threats: Urgent and necessary consolidation works required (roofing, ...)
States Parties:  Peru
Year:  2013
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*:
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices
States Parties:  Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year:  2013
Danger List:  Yes
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add
Threats*:
Other Threats: a) Serious deterioration of materials and structure; b) Deterioration of the architectural and urban coherence and integrity of the property; c) Absence of detailed and technical information on the state of conservation of the property since 2007;
States Parties:  Spain
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*:
Other Threats: State of the Guadalquivir River and dredging project
States Parties:  Egypt
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*:
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance
States Parties:  Côte d'Ivoire
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*:
States Parties:  Senegal
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*:
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants
States Parties:  Haiti
Year:  2013
Document Source:  WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add
Threats*:


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.