State of Conservation
States PartiesAfghanistan Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Chile Colombia Czechia Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Georgia Germany Haiti India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Ireland Italy Jordan Kenya Lebanon Libya Lithuania Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Morocco Mozambique Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Portugal Romania Russian Federation Senegal Serbia South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Turkey Turkmenistan Uganda Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Yemen
ThreatsManagement systems/ management plan (68) Housing (46) Management activities (19) Legal framework (16) Deliberate destruction of heritage (14) Ground transport infrastructure (12) Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure (8) Solid waste (8) Financial resources (8) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation (7) Illegal activities (7) Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure (6) Water (rain/water table) (6) Human resources (6) Marine transport infrastructure (5) Land conversion (5) Interpretative and visitation facilities (4) Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community (4) Flooding (4) Erosion and siltation/ deposition (4) Governance (4) Underground transport infrastructure (3) Wind (3) Civil unrest (3) Earthquake (3) Renewable energy facilities (2) Water infrastructure (2) Air pollution (2) Oil and gas (2) Relative humidity (2) Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system (2) Society's valuing of heritage (2) High impact research / monitoring activities (2) Commercial development (1) Industrial areas (1) Input of excess energy (1) Surface water pollution (1) Crop production (1) Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals (1) Mining (1) Water (extraction) (1) Micro-organisms (1) War (1) Other climate change impacts (1) Storms (1)
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).