State of Conservation
States PartiesAfghanistan Albania Algeria Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Bangladesh Belgium Benin Bosnia and Herzegovina Chile China Colombia Czechia Dominican Republic Egypt Estonia Ethiopia France Georgia Germany Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Libya Lithuania Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Nepal Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Senegal Serbia South Africa Spain Syrian Arab Republic Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen
ThreatsManagement systems/ management plan (72) Housing (52) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation (20) Ground transport infrastructure (16) Management activities (15) Illegal activities (11) Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community (10) Deliberate destruction of heritage (10) Human resources (10) Legal framework (10) Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure (9) Solid waste (9) Land conversion (8) Water (rain/water table) (8) Erosion and siltation/ deposition (8) Interpretative and visitation facilities (7) Financial resources (7) Flooding (5) Earthquake (5) Commercial development (4) Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure (4) Crop production (4) Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system (4) Relative humidity (3) Wind (3) Civil unrest (3) Water infrastructure (2) Temperature (2) Air transport infrastructure (1) Marine transport infrastructure (1) Underground transport infrastructure (1) Localised utilities (1) Major linear utilities (1) Pollution of marine waters (1) Surface water pollution (1) Mining (1) Micro-organisms (1) Society's valuing of heritage (1) Desertification (1) Storms (1) Governance (1) High impact research / monitoring activities (1)
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).