State of Conservation (SOC)
States PartiesAfghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Bahrain Benin Bosnia and Herzegovina Cambodia Chile China Czech Republic Dominican Republic Egypt Estonia Ethiopia Germany Honduras India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Italy Japan Jordan Kenya Lebanon Libya Lithuania Mali Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Nepal Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen
ThreatsManagement systems/ management plan(60) Housing(42) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation(18) Legal framework(17) Management activities(11) Ground transport infrastructure(10) Water (rain/water table)(8) Deliberate destruction of heritage(8) Illegal activities(8) Solid waste(7) Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community(7) Human resources(7) Flooding(6) Erosion and siltation/ deposition(6) Financial resources(6) Commercial development(5) Interpretative and visitation facilities(5) Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure(5) Land conversion(4) Wind(4) Earthquake(4) Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure(3) Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system(3) Crop production(2) Relative humidity(2) Civil unrest(2) Air transport infrastructure(1) Marine transport infrastructure(1) Localised utilities(1) Major linear utilities(1) Water infrastructure(1) Ground water pollution(1) Pollution of marine waters(1) Surface water pollution(1) Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals(1) Mining(1) Temperature(1) Society's valuing of heritage(1) Military training(1) Desertification(1) Storms(1) Governance(1) High impact research / monitoring activities(1)
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).