State of Conservation (SOC)
States PartiesAfghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Austria Azerbaijan Bangladesh Benin Canada China Czech Republic Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia Georgia Germany Honduras India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Iraq Italy Jordan Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lithuania Mali Malta Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uruguay Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Yemen Zimbabwe
ThreatsManagement systems/ management plan (62) Housing (34) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation (15) Legal framework (13) Management activities (10) Ground transport infrastructure (9) Deliberate destruction of heritage (9) Solid waste (8) Interpretative and visitation facilities (7) Water (rain/water table) (7) Illegal activities (7) Erosion and siltation/ deposition (7) Financial resources (6) Human resources (6) Commercial development (5) Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community (5) Earthquake (4) Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure (3) Flooding (3) Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure (2) Water infrastructure (2) Changes in traditional ways of life and knowledge system (2) High impact research / monitoring activities (2) Air transport infrastructure (1) Marine transport infrastructure (1) Underground transport infrastructure (1) Major linear utilities (1) Pollution of marine waters (1) Crop production (1) Land conversion (1) Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals (1) Mining (1) Relative humidity (1) Wind (1) Society's valuing of heritage (1) Civil unrest (1) Temperature change (1) Fire (widlfires) (1) Tsunami/tidal wave (1) Governance (1)
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).