State of Conservation (SOC)
States PartiesAustralia Bangladesh Belarus Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Ethiopia Guinea Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Italy Kenya Malaysia Mauritania Mexico Nepal Niger Peru Poland Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Spain Sri Lanka Tunisia Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
ThreatsManagement systems/ management plan (33) Illegal activities (25) Ground transport infrastructure (20) Mining (13) Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation (11) Land conversion (10) Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community (10) Financial resources (10) Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals (6) Civil unrest (6) Major linear utilities (5) Surface water pollution (5) Forestry /wood production (5) Housing (4) Water infrastructure (4) Oil and gas (4) Interpretative and visitation facilities (3) Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure (3) Marine transport infrastructure (3) Fishing/collecting aquatic resources (3) Water (extraction) (3) Human resources (3) Legal framework (3) Renewable energy facilities (2) Air pollution (2) Crop production (2) War (2) Fire (widlfires) (2) Invasive / alien freshwater species (2) Invasive/alien terrestrial species (2) Commercial development (1) Industrial areas (1) Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure (1) Input of excess energy (1) Commercial hunting (1) Subsistence hunting (1) Water (rain/water table) (1) Ritual / spiritual / religious and associative uses (1) Deliberate destruction of heritage (1) Other climate change impacts (1) Storms (1) Avalanche/ landslide (1) Erosion and siltation/ deposition (1) Invasive / alien marine species (1)
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).