Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

24
Reports
24
Properties concerned
20
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2012close
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
States Parties: Mauritius
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Niger
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Poverty
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort
States Parties: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: impact on the Outstanding Universal Value of the property of the rebuilt Pavilion
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Functional decay of the residential neighborhoods
States Parties: Philippines
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Deterioration of the architectural heritage fabric
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Lebanon
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top