jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

  • Results
  • Views
  • Exports
6
Reports
1
Properties
1
States Parties
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and pampas de jumanaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana peru Peru 2013 Legal framework, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and pampas de jumanaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana peru Peru 2011 Air transport infrastructure, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Housing, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, Mining,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and pampas de jumanaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana peru Peru 2009 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Illegal activities, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Mining,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and pampas de jumanaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana peru Peru 2007 Crop production, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Illegal activities, Mining,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and pampas de jumanaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana peru Peru 2006 Crop production, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Illegal activities, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Mining,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and pampas de jumanaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana peru Peru 2005 Crop production, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Illegal activities, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, No


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.