Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

38
Reports
38
Properties concerned
23
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Belarus Poland
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production Illegal activities Invasive/alien terrestrial species Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Alterations of the hydrological regime; b) Border fence impeding mammal movement
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site b) Poor state of conservation of the property
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Invasive/alien terrestrial species Mining
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Housing
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of overall conservation of the site, its parks and palaces
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan Pollution of marine waters
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Other Threats: Deepwater navigation waterway through the Bystre mouth of the Danube River
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Management systems/ management plan Water infrastructure
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground water pollution Housing Management activities Storms Surface water pollution Water infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: United States of America
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Air pollution Ground transport infrastructure
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure Housing Interpretative and visitation facilities Management activities Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye)
States Parties: Estonia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
States Parties: Czechia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Housing
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure Management systems/ management plan Quarrying

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top